Moscow Demands Staggering Sum in Compensation from Clearing House over Frozen Assets
Russia's monetary authority has declared it is seeking compensation amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to use frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine.
The Financial Lawsuit
According to reports in local news outlets, the central bank filed a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.
European Union officials will decide in the coming days regarding a proposal to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and economic needs.
The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the main keeper for the Russian frozen sovereign wealth.
A Clash Over Legality
EU authorities have argued that their proposal is legally sound. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.
The Russian government, in contrast, has called any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has warned of reciprocal measures, such as confiscating EU corporate assets within Russia.
Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.
Geopolitical Maneuvering
In comments seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."
Euroclear declined to comment on the new legal action. The institution has previously noted it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.
Legal Hurdles Ahead
Although courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.
"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant assets can be identified," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.
European Safeguards
European authorities indicated they are developing steps to deter other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against European entities. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."
How the Funding Would Work
According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.
Kyiv would solely be required to return the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year war.
Alternative Proposals
Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.
This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.
Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she stated. "It also delivers a clear signal that if you do all this destruction to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."